• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Foliovision

Main navigation

  • Weblog
    • FV Player
    • WordPress
    • Video of the Week
    • Case Studies
    • Business
  • About
    • Testimonials
    • Meet the Team
    • We Support
    • Careers
    • Contact
    • Pricing
  • Products
  • Support
    • FV Player Docs
    • Pro Support
  • Login
  • Basket is empty
Affordable VAST/VPAID for Wordpress has arrived. Serve ads with your videos starting today!

Why You Don’t Need AdobeRGB

3 September 2019 / Chiara Rendekova / Leave a Comment

If you’re keen on digital photography, it is likely that you have ran into the discussion about Colour Space settings on your camera offering you main the main colour spaces – Adobe RGB (1998) and sRGB. Even more likely, you have came across the opinion that using AdobeRGB enhances the colours in your pictures and therefore it is worthy to consider shooting and editing in it.

Technically, the AdobeRGB represents wider colour gamut but is there any practical reason for choosing it as your preferred work space?

We’ve examined the efficiency by shooting and editing in both AdobeRGB and sRGB and compared the end results.

 

sRGB vs. AdobeRGB

Choosing between the main colour spaces Adobe RGB and sRGB depends on several circumstances which are reasonable to consider before shooting:

  • The sRGB is an older colour space that represents a considerable part of total colour space and overtime became a standard used by every personal device available. Plus, it is tweaked for the web usage. Generally, if you work with a well-calibrated camera and monitor, the sRGB gets you great colour results anywhere, even in print.
  • The AdobeRGB technically provides a wider range of reproducible colours. Compared to sRGB, this space represents about 35% more colour, primarily in cyan-green hues. Using Adobe RGB claims to bring out more details of your work, which in sRGB could remain unseen. Many photographers advocate and use this profile for such purpose, which makes it a commercial industry standard. 
1. Chromacity diagram showing the color range of the Adobe RGB (1998) and sRGB color gamuts.

If you considered AdobeRGB thinking you’ll enhance your photos and thus gain more out of your work, keep in mind the disadvantages of it:

  • During an export of AdobeRGB file, colours are being squeezed into a smaller range and in order to expand them to their full range back again during re-opening, the correct software is needed to read them. Regular print labs don’t have the software that supports AdobeRGB and that could leave you disappointed with dull-coloured results. 
  • AdobeRGB is absolutely useless for sending e-mails or publishing on the Internet. As the browsers are adapted to sRGB, it is the safest bet for output to Web. If you’ve used AdobeRGB, always remember to convert your photos to sRGB and embed the correct colour profile, otherwise the browser assumes the profile is sRGB and that results in apparently muted tones of your picture.
  • Compared to ProPhoto RGB space, AdobeRGB is much smaller in colour range and size. That decreases its overall efficiency as a working space for editing.

 

Editing 

The original picture was shot in both JPEG and RAW format in AdobeRGB and sRGB version, with a Nikon Z 6 camera with a built-in 35.0 mm f/2.8 lens. Firstly, I’ve edited the RAW files in order to save the preferred settings which could be applied later to the JPEG’s. The scenery in the picture needed significant colour and light tweaking to demonstrate the range of the assigned colour profiles.

2. Initial 16-bit Camera Raw settings

Normally, I don’t go for a wild-coloured look in my pictures but I wanted to make a visible change this time in order to trace the possible advantages of AdobeRGB.

Letting the natural light come in allowed the components in the picture to become more outstanding in their colours. I’ve made the light a little bit softer by lowering the basic Contrast and Highlight levels and additionally worked with the Tone Curve. After that I was ready to start with the colour enrichment. To begin with, I’ve elevated the Temperature to a warmer level (6000K). After that I’ve focused on the advanced HLS colour adjustments – mainly the strongly present Reds and Oranges of the objects and with regard to AdobeRGB specs also on Blues, Greens and little bit of Aquas which are supposed to be among the biggest virtues of the profile (see picture n.1). As last but not the least step, I’ve increased the overall Vibrance and Saturation. 

Below, you can see how the Camera Raw settings evolved, step-by-step :

3. Open in full-screen mode to track the changes in Camera Raw settings.

After the identical edit of both RAW files was finished, I’ve exported them and applied the same changes to both original JPEG files.

 
 

Results

[twentytwenty]

[/twentytwenty]

Left: AdobeRGB, Right: sRGB

To my surprise, the compared JPEG pictures don’t differ very much in the colour quality. However, you can spot a notable difference in the area of sky – more complex blue tones and less banding effect makes the AdobeRGB image version of afternoon street more sophisticated compared to the sRGB.

Detail of blue hues (Left: AdobeRGB, Right: sRGB)

Although the blue colours in the sRGB image suffer, it doesn’t include the greens:

4. Detail of green hues (Left: AdobeRGB, Right: sRGB)

 

 Adobe Photoshop vs. DxO PhotoLab

Another factor influencing the results is the software you use for post-processing. My software of choice was Photoshop and as you could see above, the results were very moderate. However, the same pictures, edited in DxO PhotoLab software, came up with more significant differences between in the outcome. Of course, I wasn’t expecting the same results as the changes applied in DxO PhotoLab were not identical to the ones from Photoshop edit but that doesn’t erase the stronger feel of 

  • obviously richer blue colours (AdobeRGB)
  • worse banding effect in the area of sky (sRGB)
5. JPEG’s edited in DxO PhotoLab (Left: AdobeRGB, Right: sRGB)

If you are shooting RAW, then it really doesn’t matter what colour profile you pick on your camera. The RAW images doesn’t include any colour information and therefore these files don’t have any colour space associated with it. Colour profile information only applies to the JPEG version of the image. The praised AdobeRGB colour profile did bring out certain colour qualities in the test.

The question to be solved is – what could be a practical reason for someone to post-process the pictures in a JPEG format? Let me know in the comments below!

chiara-rendekova

Chiara Rendeková

Chiara was born and raised in the neighbourhood of Petržalka in Bratislava. Besides studying Marketing Communication at Comenius University, she happens to be an observer, mostly through the lens of a camera.

Categories: Design

Related Posts

  1. Choosing a working colour space for photography: sRGB, AdobeRGB, Wide Gamut RGB or ProPhoto RGB

  2. High ISO Noise Reduction: CaptureOne vs DXO PhotoLab

  3. Adobe Software Licenses for Sale

    Adobe Software Licenses for Sale

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You can click here to Subscribe without commenting

Primary Sidebar

Categories

  • Business
  • Camera Reviews
  • Case Studies
  • Design
  • FV Player
  • Internet Marketing
  • IT
  • Life
  • SEO
  • Slovak
  • Video of the Week
  • WordPress

Footer

Our Plugins

  • FV WordPress Flowplayer
  • FV Thoughtful Comments
  • FV Simpler SEO
  • FV Antispam
  • FV Gravatar Cache
  • FV Testimonials

Free Tools

  • Pandoc Online
  • Article spinner
  • WordPress Password Finder
  • Delete LinkedIn Account
  • Responsive Design Calculator
Foliovision logo
All materials © 2025 Foliovision s.r.o. | Panská 12 - 81101 Bratislava - Slovakia | info@foliovision.com
  • This Site Uses Cookies
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Tel. ‭+421 2/5292 0086‬

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

You can find out more about which cookies we are using or switch them off in .

Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie allow you to log in and download your software or post to forums.

We use the WordPress login cookie and the session cookie.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.

Support Cookies

Foliovision.com uses self-hosted Rocket.chat and self-hosted Freescout support desk to provide support for FV Player users. These cookies allow our visitors to chat with us and/or submit support tickets.

We are delighted to recommend self-hosted Rocket.chat and especially Freescout to other privacy-conscious independent publishers who would prefer to self-host support.

Please enable Strictly Necessary Cookies first so that we can save your preferences!

3rd Party Cookies

This website uses Google Analytics and Statcounter to collect anonymous information such as the number of visitors to the site, and the most popular pages.

Keeping this cookie enabled helps us to improve our website.

We reluctantly use Google Analytics as it helps us to test FV Player against popular Google Analytics features. Feel free to turn off these cookies if they make you feel uncomfortable.

Statcounter is an independent Irish stats service which we have been using since the beginning of recorded time, sixteen years ago.

Please enable Strictly Necessary Cookies first so that we can save your preferences!