<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Keyloggers for OS X &#8211; Why you should install one and which one to choose: Spellcatcher, BackTrack, logKext</title>
	<atom:link href="http://foliovision.com/2010/01/17/keyloggers-mac-os-x/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://foliovision.com/2010/01/17/keyloggers-mac-os-x</link>
	<description>Making the web work for you</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 13:53:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: alec</title>
		<link>http://foliovision.com/2010/01/17/keyloggers-mac-os-x#comment-294884</link>
		<dc:creator>alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 19:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foliovision.com/?p=474#comment-294884</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure Vanilla. There&#039;s a fair number of vendors I&#039;d trust with keylogging software. If any reputable vendor with a real business put spyware into his or her software, the noise about it would destroy their business. There were a couple of similar incidents with very intrusive licensing and most companies were forced to back down and still see their reputation ruined.

I certainly wouldn&#039;t be buying keyloggers from Aobo et al. and expect not to be spied on though. A pity about logkext.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure Vanilla. There&#8217;s a fair number of vendors I&#8217;d trust with keylogging software. If any reputable vendor with a real business put spyware into his or her software, the noise about it would destroy their business. There were a couple of similar incidents with very intrusive licensing and most companies were forced to back down and still see their reputation ruined.</p>
<p>I certainly wouldn&#8217;t be buying keyloggers from Aobo et al. and expect not to be spied on though. A pity about logkext.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vanilla</title>
		<link>http://foliovision.com/2010/01/17/keyloggers-mac-os-x#comment-294788</link>
		<dc:creator>vanilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foliovision.com/?p=474#comment-294788</guid>
		<description>Oh... should mention the downside of opensource: it does some of the work for the bad-guys who don&#039;t need to start from scratch to write nasty malware, such as the malware that Apple now &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.macnn.com/articles/10/06/18/apple.downplaying.malware.threat/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;silently looks for since 10.6.4&lt;/a&gt;

Maybe it would need to be code-signed. Source code is still available for logkext though no longer developed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh&#8230; should mention the downside of opensource: it does some of the work for the bad-guys who don&#8217;t need to start from scratch to write nasty malware, such as the malware that Apple now <a href="http://www.macnn.com/articles/10/06/18/apple.downplaying.malware.threat/" rel="nofollow" class="liexternal">silently looks for since 10.6.4</a></p>
<p>Maybe it would need to be code-signed. Source code is still available for logkext though no longer developed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vanilla</title>
		<link>http://foliovision.com/2010/01/17/keyloggers-mac-os-x#comment-294779</link>
		<dc:creator>vanilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foliovision.com/?p=474#comment-294779</guid>
		<description>Since keystroke loggers are a major tool in cyber-crime, I don&#039;t think I&#039;d really trust one unless it was fully-vouched-for open-source. My wishlist would include a hotkey to turn it on and off, and obvious indicator whether it was on or off, like a red &quot;recording&quot; light icon in toolbar (similar to the binoculars that appear when screen sharing).

Longterm better solution would be firefox plugin so that keystroke recording took place only when using firefox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since keystroke loggers are a major tool in cyber-crime, I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;d really trust one unless it was fully-vouched-for open-source. My wishlist would include a hotkey to turn it on and off, and obvious indicator whether it was on or off, like a red &#8220;recording&#8221; light icon in toolbar (similar to the binoculars that appear when screen sharing).</p>
<p>Longterm better solution would be firefox plugin so that keystroke recording took place only when using firefox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alec</title>
		<link>http://foliovision.com/2010/01/17/keyloggers-mac-os-x#comment-179835</link>
		<dc:creator>alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Dec 2010 20:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foliovision.com/?p=474#comment-179835</guid>
		<description>Thanks for stopping by Case.

Give BackTrack a try, Case, if you don&#039;t feel like contending with the logKext internals. BackTrack is very nice and offers already clean text sorted by application/window. Luxury version. I haven&#039;t had issues when running BackTrack (albeit it mostly under Leopard 10.5.8).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for stopping by Case.</p>
<p>Give BackTrack a try, Case, if you don&#8217;t feel like contending with the logKext internals. BackTrack is very nice and offers already clean text sorted by application/window. Luxury version. I haven&#8217;t had issues when running BackTrack (albeit it mostly under Leopard 10.5.8).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: casedeville</title>
		<link>http://foliovision.com/2010/01/17/keyloggers-mac-os-x#comment-176936</link>
		<dc:creator>casedeville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 02:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foliovision.com/?p=474#comment-176936</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the thorough review! I&#039;ve been using logKext for a couple years now on Leopard, and just upgraded to Snow Leopard and it stopped working. I&#039;m still trying to work through the issue, but thought in the meantime I&#039;d drop my two cents on the idea of running a key logger in the first place.

There have been several times that I&#039;ve searched for something on the internet, or found a good site but my browser history didn&#039;t go that far back. Even searching for where I might have typed about a certain topic (email, chat convo, forum, etc.) can be a good use for a key logger.

Sure, I could extend my browser history, centralize all my conversations, or grow a larger memory sector of my brain instead of installing a key logger. But the reality is that there is a legitimate use for one on a personal computer. It might not be the most secure thing to do, but for the most part, I&#039;ve been very glad I have it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the thorough review! I&#8217;ve been using logKext for a couple years now on Leopard, and just upgraded to Snow Leopard and it stopped working. I&#8217;m still trying to work through the issue, but thought in the meantime I&#8217;d drop my two cents on the idea of running a key logger in the first place.</p>
<p>There have been several times that I&#8217;ve searched for something on the internet, or found a good site but my browser history didn&#8217;t go that far back. Even searching for where I might have typed about a certain topic (email, chat convo, forum, etc.) can be a good use for a key logger.</p>
<p>Sure, I could extend my browser history, centralize all my conversations, or grow a larger memory sector of my brain instead of installing a key logger. But the reality is that there is a legitimate use for one on a personal computer. It might not be the most secure thing to do, but for the most part, I&#8217;ve been very glad I have it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iroh</title>
		<link>http://foliovision.com/2010/01/17/keyloggers-mac-os-x#comment-72806</link>
		<dc:creator>Iroh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 17:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foliovision.com/?p=474#comment-72806</guid>
		<description>I have tried a number of keyloggers and I&#039;ve found that logkext really is amazingly useful. I can imagine someone might find logkext confusing if they are not used to interacting with an application in that way, but if they&#039;re willing to get past that I think many keylogger users would find it ideal.

Some people here are questioning the usefulness of keylogging on the grounds that there are alternatives ways of saving written data. And if you are a really careful person then you might prefer to save every single thing you ever write to a text document before sending it on. Personally though I wouldn&#039;t go to such lengths as I believe keylogging is a much easier way to capture written work from every source, including those sources which might not have native or practical saving options available. 
Alec has already  given examples of such occasions by explaining how it can save data lost as a result of accidentally clicking a link or pressing the back button, but for me it is even better because it makes a complete record of everything I have written since I last cleared the logs. If you have ever lost or deleted a text document, had a gmail/msn/ichat/facebook/irc chat with someone, or posted in a place like this then the undeniable use of keyloggers is apparent. For example, if in a month I wanted to see a record of what I wrote here, then by doing a search for strings of text I remember using - in this case something like &quot;keylogger&quot; which is unique to this entry - I could almost immediately retrieve this exact  post. And all this is in one file, which is encrypted by default and which can have the location and name of the output changed to avoid malware and trojany things searching for logged data.

I have been saved numerous times where there is no practical alternative way to save or where saving might not have seemed necessary at the time, or simply when I accidentally deleted a text file by mistake.

Given the usefulness of this application over the others I have tried, I would be willing to agree with Alec&#039;s review of the logger applications available. If you are like me, then sooner or later it&#039;s sure to save your backside.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have tried a number of keyloggers and I&#8217;ve found that logkext really is amazingly useful. I can imagine someone might find logkext confusing if they are not used to interacting with an application in that way, but if they&#8217;re willing to get past that I think many keylogger users would find it ideal.</p>
<p>Some people here are questioning the usefulness of keylogging on the grounds that there are alternatives ways of saving written data. And if you are a really careful person then you might prefer to save every single thing you ever write to a text document before sending it on. Personally though I wouldn&#8217;t go to such lengths as I believe keylogging is a much easier way to capture written work from every source, including those sources which might not have native or practical saving options available.<br />
Alec has already  given examples of such occasions by explaining how it can save data lost as a result of accidentally clicking a link or pressing the back button, but for me it is even better because it makes a complete record of everything I have written since I last cleared the logs. If you have ever lost or deleted a text document, had a gmail/msn/ichat/facebook/irc chat with someone, or posted in a place like this then the undeniable use of keyloggers is apparent. For example, if in a month I wanted to see a record of what I wrote here, then by doing a search for strings of text I remember using &#8211; in this case something like &#8220;keylogger&#8221; which is unique to this entry &#8211; I could almost immediately retrieve this exact  post. And all this is in one file, which is encrypted by default and which can have the location and name of the output changed to avoid malware and trojany things searching for logged data.</p>
<p>I have been saved numerous times where there is no practical alternative way to save or where saving might not have seemed necessary at the time, or simply when I accidentally deleted a text file by mistake.</p>
<p>Given the usefulness of this application over the others I have tried, I would be willing to agree with Alec&#8217;s review of the logger applications available. If you are like me, then sooner or later it&#8217;s sure to save your backside.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alec</title>
		<link>http://foliovision.com/2010/01/17/keyloggers-mac-os-x#comment-66746</link>
		<dc:creator>alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 04:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foliovision.com/?p=474#comment-66746</guid>
		<description>Cool. Keep us posted about how you like it over time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool. Keep us posted about how you like it over time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J</title>
		<link>http://foliovision.com/2010/01/17/keyloggers-mac-os-x#comment-66498</link>
		<dc:creator>J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foliovision.com/?p=474#comment-66498</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m from Uk so I wouldnt know anybody from there. Digital sentry was the  daily deal on maczot on 14th August 2010. That’s where It was brought into my sights</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m from Uk so I wouldnt know anybody from there. Digital sentry was the  daily deal on maczot on 14th August 2010. That’s where It was brought into my sights</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alec</title>
		<link>http://foliovision.com/2010/01/17/keyloggers-mac-os-x#comment-66463</link>
		<dc:creator>alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 15:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foliovision.com/?p=474#comment-66463</guid>
		<description>Hi J,

I don&#039;t care much for Kango software. It&#039;s almost always copycat and usually inferior to the original. Plus Kango use all kinds of strong arm marketing tactics. Actually, it sounds like you might work there or know the guys there pretty well.

I&#039;d still recommend BackTrack but Digital Sentry couldn&#039;t be worse than a lot of the other entries in this space from thieves like SpectorSoft and Aobo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi J,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t care much for Kango software. It&#8217;s almost always copycat and usually inferior to the original. Plus Kango use all kinds of strong arm marketing tactics. Actually, it sounds like you might work there or know the guys there pretty well.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d still recommend BackTrack but Digital Sentry couldn&#8217;t be worse than a lot of the other entries in this space from thieves like SpectorSoft and Aobo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J</title>
		<link>http://foliovision.com/2010/01/17/keyloggers-mac-os-x#comment-65182</link>
		<dc:creator>J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 22:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foliovision.com/?p=474#comment-65182</guid>
		<description>At last I have found a key logger that i&#039;m happy with...Its called Digital Sentry by koingo software.
Try it yourself..

After install go to preferences&gt;logging&gt;enable save all keystrokes to a file..

Then do some typing and find the saved keystokes in library&gt;logs

Works beautiffully

What do others think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At last I have found a key logger that i&#8217;m happy with&#8230;Its called Digital Sentry by koingo software.<br />
Try it yourself..</p>
<p>After install go to preferences&gt;logging&gt;enable save all keystrokes to a file..</p>
<p>Then do some typing and find the saved keystokes in library&gt;logs</p>
<p>Works beautiffully</p>
<p>What do others think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

