<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Foliopress WSYIWYG will be PHP5 Only</title>
	<link>http://foliovision.com/2008/01/03/why-php5-only/</link>
	<description>Making the web work for you</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 11:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Lorne</title>
		<link>http://foliovision.com/2008/01/03/why-php5-only/#comment-18540</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 10:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://foliovision.com/2008/01/03/why-php5-only/#comment-18540</guid>
		<description>And I'm back checking if Lorne's comments will stick eventually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I&#8217;m back checking if Lorne&#8217;s comments will stick eventually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PHP 5 Only Plugins: Good, Bad, Evil?</title>
		<link>http://foliovision.com/2008/01/03/why-php5-only/#comment-2857</link>
		<dc:creator>PHP 5 Only Plugins: Good, Bad, Evil?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 13:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://foliovision.com/2008/01/03/why-php5-only/#comment-2857</guid>
		<description>[...] Alec at FolioVision has discussed not making some plugins PHP 5 compatible, but for different reasons. I would like to think that he&#8217;s right, that the number of hosts offering PHP 4 will drop quickly, but I&#8217;m not quite so certain. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Alec at FolioVision has discussed not making some plugins PHP 5 compatible, but for different reasons. I would like to think that he&#8217;s right, that the number of hosts offering PHP 4 will drop quickly, but I&#8217;m not quite so certain. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
