<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Foliopress WSYIWYG will be PHP5 Only</title>
	<atom:link href="http://foliovision.com/2008/01/03/why-php5-only/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://foliovision.com/2008/01/03/why-php5-only</link>
	<description>Making the web work for you</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 13:53:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: PHP 5 Only Plugins: Good, Bad, Evil?</title>
		<link>http://foliovision.com/2008/01/03/why-php5-only#comment-2857</link>
		<dc:creator>PHP 5 Only Plugins: Good, Bad, Evil?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 13:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foliovision.com/2008/01/03/why-php5-only/#comment-2857</guid>
		<description>[...] Alec at FolioVision has discussed not making some plugins PHP 5 compatible, but for different reasons. I would like to think that he&#8217;s right, that the number of hosts offering PHP 4 will drop quickly, but I&#8217;m not quite so certain. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Alec at FolioVision has discussed not making some plugins PHP 5 compatible, but for different reasons. I would like to think that he&#8217;s right, that the number of hosts offering PHP 4 will drop quickly, but I&#8217;m not quite so certain. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

