<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Coding Languages, a developer&#8217;s new girlfriend</title>
	<link>http://foliovision.com/2007/11/29/cakephp-versus-ruby-on-rails/</link>
	<description>Making the web work for you</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 22:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Baz L</title>
		<link>http://foliovision.com/2007/11/29/cakephp-versus-ruby-on-rails/#comment-14099</link>
		<dc:creator>Baz L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 13:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://foliovision.com/2007/11/29/cakephp-versus-ruby-on-rails/#comment-14099</guid>
		<description>Should have done this MUCH earlier: The reference to my post is much appreciated.

ThankX</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should have done this MUCH earlier: The reference to my post is much appreciated.</p>
<p>ThankX</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alec</title>
		<link>http://foliovision.com/2007/11/29/cakephp-versus-ruby-on-rails/#comment-2221</link>
		<dc:creator>alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://foliovision.com/2007/11/29/cakephp-versus-ruby-on-rails/#comment-2221</guid>
		<description>Are these Wrike people for real, or is this comment spam?

Anybody out there really using Wrike?

I find that Write far too ugly and complicated to go back to after Basecamp.

Basecamp can do almost anything you want as long as you are willing to use a little bit of intellect on the issue (such as ordering task priority: keep a single list for each employee across all projects). This way the bare app remains lean and useful.

Looks do matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are these Wrike people for real, or is this comment spam?</p>
<p>Anybody out there really using Wrike?</p>
<p>I find that Write far too ugly and complicated to go back to after Basecamp.</p>
<p>Basecamp can do almost anything you want as long as you are willing to use a little bit of intellect on the issue (such as ordering task priority: keep a single list for each employee across all projects). This way the bare app remains lean and useful.</p>
<p>Looks do matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://foliovision.com/2007/11/29/cakephp-versus-ruby-on-rails/#comment-2219</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://foliovision.com/2007/11/29/cakephp-versus-ruby-on-rails/#comment-2219</guid>
		<description>[wrikespam]

As to projct management software, I like niether Basecamp nor Connector. Connector is just to slow, and Basecamp is just too dumb, when you need to manage multiple pojects. I recently found Wrike http://www.wrike.com/ and tried it for several small projects. So far it looks like the tool I gonna use for the whole business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[wrikespam]</p>
<p>As to projct management software, I like niether Basecamp nor Connector. Connector is just to slow, and Basecamp is just too dumb, when you need to manage multiple pojects. I recently found Wrike <a href="http://www.wrike.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.wrike.com/</a> and tried it for several small projects. So far it looks like the tool I gonna use for the whole business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
